Chapter 7 · Designing the study
How do you study what numbers cannot measure?
Ethnography, phenomenology, focus groups, in-depth interviews and triangulation.
21 TNMGRMU questions answered hereset 22 times, 2014–2025
The problem first
You are a Community Medicine resident. Your thesis survey shows that 38 of 100 patients started on TB treatment in your block stopped before completing it. The questionnaire offered five reasons to tick, and most patients ticked “other”.
Your guide reads the table and asks one question.
“Why did they stop, and how will you find out?”
Start here
What can a questionnaire not tell you?
A questionnaire counts how many people did something. It cannot tell you what the experience meant to them, or why they acted as they did, unless you already knew the possible answers when you wrote it.
Introducing a BMJ series in 1995, Pope and Mays wrote that qualitative and quantitative research tend to be portrayed as opposites, and set out to show how qualitative methods can complement quantitative research.
Comparison
Qualitative or quantitative: how do they differ, and when do you choose each?
Quantitative research asks how many, how much and how often. Qualitative research asks what, how and why.
| Feature | Quantitative | Qualitative |
|---|---|---|
| Aim | Measure, compare, test a hypothesis | Understand experiences, meanings and processes in their natural setting |
| Sample | Large, ideally random, size from a power or precision calculation | Small, chosen on purpose, size decided by saturation |
| Data | Numbers from structured questionnaires, scales and tests | Words and observations from interviews, focus groups and fieldwork |
| Design | Fixed in the protocol before data collection | Can change as findings emerge (emerging design) |
| Researcher | Kept at a distance, with standard procedures | Interacts with participants and is the main research instrument |
| Analysis | Statistics | Coding, categories and themes |
| Quality judged by | Validity, reliability, objectivity | Credibility, transferability, dependability, confirmability |
| Result | Estimates with confidence intervals that can be generalised | Themes, descriptions or a theory that readers judge for transfer to their setting |
| Reporting guideline | CONSORT, STROBE | COREQ, SRQR |
Choose qualitative methods when
- Little is known about the topic and you do not yet know which questions to ask.
- You need people's experiences, beliefs or reasons in their own words.
- You need to understand how a programme or process actually works in its setting.
- You want to word a questionnaire, or explain a survey result.
Choose quantitative methods when
- You need a number for a population: a prevalence, an average or a risk.
- You want to test a hypothesis or compare treatments.
- You need results that apply beyond the people studied, with a known margin of error.
Many studies combine the two (mixed methods). A focus group discussion of a questionnaire is useful for testing how its questions are worded and for explaining survey results (Kitzinger, 1995). The ICMR 2017 guidelines note that implementation research often uses mixed quantitative and qualitative methods. See the study designs chapter for quantitative designs.
Interactive
Sort research questions into qualitative, quantitative or mixed methods
How many, how much and how often need numbers. What, how and why need words. A question that needs both needs mixed methods.
Try this: read the research question, choose the approach that answers it, then read the explanation. You can change your answer.
Question 1 of 9 · teaching examples
What proportion of patients started on TB treatment in this block stop before completing it?
Choose an approach to see the explanation.
Designs
What are the main qualitative designs?
Ethnography, phenomenology and grounded theory are often called the 'big three' qualitative approaches. The case study is a fourth design, used to study a programme, policy or event in its real-life setting. The research question decides which one fits.
Ethnography
The study of the culture of a group: its shared behaviour, beliefs and practices. The researcher spends long periods in the setting, observes, holds informal conversations and interviews key informants, and writes a detailed description of the culture (Korstjens and Moser, 2017). Bronisław Malinowski's Argonauts of the Western Pacific (1922) was based on months of living among the Trobriand Islanders, watching their daily work and speaking with them in their own language.
Phenomenology
The study of lived experience: what it is like to have a condition or go through an event, from the person's own point of view. Participants are chosen because they have had the experience. Data come mainly from in-depth interviews, and the findings are themes that describe the essential meaning of the experience (Moser and Korstjens, 2017). As a philosophy, phenomenology was launched by Edmund Husserl in Logical Investigations (1900–01). In later work he proposed “bracketing” the question of whether the outside world exists, in order to study the structure of experience itself.
Grounded theory
Builds a theory from the data instead of testing one chosen in advance. Barney Glaser and Anselm Strauss described it in The Discovery of Grounded Theory (1967). Collection and analysis run together. Each new piece of data is compared with what has already been coded (the constant comparative method), and the next participants are chosen for what they can add to the developing theory (theoretical sampling). Sampling stops at theoretical saturation, which Glaser and Strauss defined as the point where “no additional data are being found whereby the sociologist can develop properties of the category”.
Case study
An in-depth study of one case, or a few, in its real-life context: a patient's episode of care, a ward, or a hospital's new service. The case has a defined boundary in time and place, and several data sources are combined (Crowe et al., 2011). Stake described three types: intrinsic (a case studied because it is unique), instrumental (a case used to understand a broader issue) and collective (several cases studied together).
Other approaches include narrative research, conversation analysis, historical research, participatory action research, and descriptive studies analysed by thematic or content analysis.
Decide
Which design fits your question?
Answer one or two questions. Each answer links to the section that explains it.
What do you need to find out?
Which design: all possible answers
- A quantitative design: Survey, case-control, cohort or trial. Choose by your question and use a sample size calculation.
- Mixed methods: Use focus groups or interviews before a survey to word the questions, or after it to explain the results.
- Ethnography: Long periods in the setting, participant observation, informal conversations and key informant interviews.
- Phenomenology: In-depth interviews with people who have had the experience. The result is a set of themes describing it.
- Grounded theory: Collect and analyse together, compare each new piece of data with earlier codes, and sample for the developing theory.
- Case study: Define the boundary of the case, then combine interviews, documents, observation and records.
- Descriptive qualitative study: Interviews or focus groups analysed by thematic or content analysis.
Data collection
How do you collect qualitative data?
The three most used methods are participant observation, in-depth interviews and focus group discussions. Many studies combine more than one.
| Feature | Focus group discussion | In-depth interview |
|---|---|---|
| People | 6 to 12 participants | One participant |
| Data come from | The discussion between participants | One person's account |
| Best for | How views and ideas form and operate within a group or culture | Personal histories, personal issues, individual experience |
| Staff | A moderator and a note-taker | An interviewer |
| Written guide | Questioning route | Interview guide |
| Duration | 45 to 120 minutes (guides differ) | 30 to 90 minutes |
| Main risk | Dominant participants, or the moderator, sway the group | Socially desirable answers, interviewer influence |
Focus group discussions
How do you run a focus group discussion?
A focus group is not a group interview in which each person answers in turn. The method uses the discussion between participants as data.
- Size: most focus groups have 6 to 12 participants. Smaller groups of 4 to 6 suit topics where each person has an intensive experience to share (Wong, 2008).
- Composition: people who share a key characteristic talk more freely. Keep groups separate when one group would stop another from speaking, for example younger and older women discussing sexual behaviour (Wong, 2008).
- Staff: a moderator guides the discussion. A note-taker records what was said, who spoke in what order, and the tone of the discussion.
- Questioning route: open-ended questions, general ones first and specific ones later, tested in a mock group (Moser and Korstjens, 2017).
- Duration: 45 to 90 minutes in one guide (Wong, 2008), 90 to 120 minutes in another (Moser and Korstjens, 2017).
- Number of groups: continue until no new themes appear. In empirical tests, saturation came within 4 to 8 focus groups (Hennink and Kaiser, 2022).
What the moderator does
- Explains the purpose, the ground rules, how the session is recorded, and who will see the information.
- Asks participants to speak one at a time, and says there are no right or wrong answers.
- Uses probes such as “Can you tell me more?” or “Would you give me an example?”.
- Watches the group so that everyone takes part. When some people dominate, addresses questions to those who have not spoken.
- Brings the discussion back when it moves away from the topic, and keeps to time.
- Stays neutral, because the moderator's own views can sway the group.
Teaching scenario: in a group of eight mothers discussing missed measles vaccination, one mother says loudly that the vaccine causes fever, and the others go quiet. The moderator thanks her, asks “Has anyone had a different experience?”, and turns to a mother who has not yet spoken.
In-depth interviews
How do you conduct an in-depth interview?
A one-to-one conversation that explores one person's experiences and views on a set of issues in detail.
- Types: structured (fixed questions in fixed order), semi-structured (a guide of topics and open questions) and unstructured (a few broad topics). Most qualitative interviews are semi-structured.
- Interview guide: open questions, then follow-up questions. Probes are exploratory questions such as “Then what happened?”. Prompts are signs that encourage the person to go on, such as eye contact and leaning forward. Pilot the guide first.
- Length: 30 to 90 minutes, audio-recorded with consent and transcribed word for word.
- Key informant interviews: interviews with people who have special knowledge of the topic and can help you gain access to others.
- Problems to plan for: gatekeepers, finding a private place, socially desirable answers, and participants reluctant to talk (Moser and Korstjens, 2017).
Observation
What does observation mean in qualitative research?
It is not clinical observation of a patient. The researcher systematically watches people and events in their natural setting to understand behaviour and interactions, and writes field notes (Mays and Pope, 1995).
Sampling
Whom do you study, and how many?
Participants are chosen on purpose, for the information they can give. The number is decided by saturation, not by a power calculation.
The usual strategies are purposive, criterion, theoretical, snowball and convenience sampling. The sampling chapter describes each method. Ethnography usually samples key informants, phenomenology samples people who have had the experience, and grounded theory moves from purposive to theoretical sampling (Moser and Korstjens, 2017).
Data saturation is the point at which new data give no new analytical information. It is common to carry out two or three more interviews to confirm it (Moser and Korstjens, 2017). Published tests give a guide to numbers:
- Guest and colleagues (2006), analysing 60 interviews, found saturation within the first 12.
- Hennink and colleagues found that 9 interviews identified the range of issues (code saturation), but 16 to 24 were needed to understand them in depth (meaning saturation).
- A systematic review found saturation within 9 to 17 interviews or 4 to 8 focus groups, mostly in studies of fairly similar participants with narrow objectives (Hennink and Kaiser, 2022).
In the protocol, state the sampling criteria, an estimated number with its basis, and how you will judge saturation.
Interactive
Add interviews one at a time and watch the number of new codes fall
Each interview is compared with the codes already found. Data collection stops when further interviews add nothing new.
Try this: add interviews one at a time until three in a row add no new codes. Then choose Varied participants and start again.
Teaching simulation with made-up codes. Similar participants share 30 possible codes. Varied participants share the same codes plus 15 that few people mention.
Interview 6 added 0 new codes. The last new code came in interview 5.
Stopping rule not yet met: three interviews in a row must add no new code. Codes in this made-up pool that no participant has mentioned yet: 4.
Codes that few participants mention appear late, so varied participants need more interviews. In published tests, saturation came within 9 to 17 interviews, mostly in studies of fairly similar participants with narrow objectives (Hennink and Kaiser, 2022).
Analysis
What do you do with hours of transcripts?
Analysis starts after the first interview, not after the last. You label parts of the text with codes, group codes into categories, and build themes that answer the research question.
The six phases of thematic analysis (Braun and Clarke, 2006)
- Familiarising yourself with your data: transcribe, read and re-read, and note initial ideas.
- Generating initial codes: code interesting features systematically across the whole data set.
- Searching for themes: collate codes into possible themes.
- Reviewing themes: check each theme against the coded extracts and the whole data set.
- Defining and naming themes: refine what each theme covers and give it a clear name.
- Producing the report: choose clear extracts and relate the analysis to the research question and the literature.
The phases are not strictly in sequence. You move back and forth between them. Grounded theory uses constant comparison with open, axial and selective coding. The framework approach and content analysis are other methods.
Software
Software stores, codes, searches and retrieves text, but you still decide the codes and themes (Moser and Korstjens, 2017). Programs include NVivo, ATLAS.ti and MAXQDA. QDA Miner Lite is free, and Taguette is free and open source.
Interactive
Assign interview quotes to themes and see the codes group together
Each quote gets a code for its idea. Codes from different patients that share a pattern of meaning form a theme.
Try this: choose a theme for each quote and read the feedback. Then look at the table at the bottom, where the codes from different patients are grouped under your themes.
Teaching example: made-up quotes from patients in the TB study who stopped treatment early.
Your themes
| Theme | Quotes you placed here | Codes |
|---|---|---|
| Feeling cured | none yet | |
| Cost of attending | none yet | |
| Fear of others knowing | none yet | |
| Side effects of the tablets | none yet |
A code labels one idea in one piece of text. A theme is a pattern of meaning found across the data set, so it gathers codes from many participants.
Quality
How do you show that qualitative findings can be trusted?
Lincoln and Guba (1985) proposed four criteria for trustworthiness, as equivalents of the terms used in quantitative research.
| Feature | Quantitative term | Qualitative equivalent |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy of findings | Internal validity | Credibility: prolonged engagement, persistent observation, triangulation, peer debriefing, and member checking (testing findings with the participants) |
| Applying findings elsewhere | External validity | Transferability: a detailed ("thick") description of participants and setting lets readers judge whether findings apply to theirs |
| Consistency | Reliability | Dependability: an audit trail records each decision in data collection and analysis |
| Neutrality | Objectivity | Confirmability: findings can be traced to the data, not to the researcher's views |
Reflexivity means stating your own background and position and considering how they influenced data collection and interpretation (Korstjens and Moser, 2017). Mays and Pope (1995) also describe coding transcripts by more than one researcher and feeding findings back to participants.
Triangulation
What is triangulation?
Studying the same question with more than one method, data source, investigator or theory, to build a fuller understanding and to check whether the findings agree.
Denzin and Patton identified four types (Carter et al., 2014):
- Data source triangulation: different people, times or places, for example patients, relatives and health workers.
- Investigator triangulation: more than one researcher collects or analyses the data.
- Theory triangulation: more than one theory is used to interpret the data.
- Method triangulation: more than one method, for example interviews, focus groups and record review.
Lincoln and Guba list triangulation as one way to establish credibility. In case studies, data collected in different ways are expected to lead to similar conclusions (Crowe et al., 2011).
Social network analysis
How do you study relationships between people or organisations?
Social network analysis maps who is connected to whom. People or organisations are nodes, and the relationships between them are ties.
Hawe and Ghali (2007) mapped staff relationships in a school. The person named by the most colleagues (highest degree centrality) was not always the best choice of intervention champion. To reach the most marginal people, betweenness centrality could be the better guide.
The centrality and density scores are numbers. In qualitative social network analysis, participants draw or describe their networks in interviews and explain the relationships. In a South African study, hospital staff used Net-Map, marking actors, arrows for relationships and towers for influence, to show who drove the implementation of national quality standards (Mabena and Armstrong, 2025).
Strengths and limits
What can qualitative studies do, and what can they not do?
Strengths
- Explain the reasons, meanings and processes behind numbers.
- Study topics where little is known, and generate hypotheses and questionnaire items.
- Take account of the setting, and remain open to findings nobody expected.
- Include people who cannot read or write, and people reluctant to be interviewed alone (focus groups).
- Allow the design to change as findings emerge.
- Need small samples, so they are feasible in one unit or community.
Limits
- Cannot give a prevalence or an effect size, and findings cannot be generalised statistically.
- The researcher's views can influence the data and the interpretation.
- Data collection, transcription and analysis take a long time.
- Quality depends on the skill of the interviewer or moderator.
- Participants may give socially desirable answers, or behave differently when observed.
- Full confidentiality is harder, because quotes and small settings can identify people.
By specialty
Qualitative questions by specialty
Measles vaccination coverage is low in two villages. The coverage survey gives the figure but not the reasons.
Hold separate focus groups with mothers and with grandmothers, interview the health workers, and compare what each group says (data source triangulation).
Patients on TB treatment stop after two months, and the treatment card records only the date they stopped.
In-depth interviews with patients who stopped, chosen on purpose to vary in age, sex and distance from the clinic.
Many patients who are advised a stoma decline the operation.
Private one-to-one interviews, away from the ward round, can bring out fears and beliefs that the consent discussion did not.
Women in a block continue to deliver at home although hospital delivery is free.
Women of similar age talk more freely together. Hold separate focus groups for mothers-in-law.
Parents of babies in the NICU describe distress, but the unit's satisfaction score is high.
Phenomenology: interview parents who have had the experience and describe it in their words.
Family caregivers of people with schizophrenia describe how caring has changed their own lives.
Phenomenological interviews. Plan in advance what you will do if a participant becomes distressed.
Information is lost when patients are handed over from theatre to the ICU.
Observe handovers and write field notes, then interview staff. Decide your observer role and get permission first.
A hospital is slow to implement national quality standards.
Qualitative social network analysis: staff map who influences whom, then explain those relationships in interviews.
Common myths
Common mistaken beliefs
Myth: Qualitative research is only opinion.
It has defined designs, sampling strategies, analysis methods and quality criteria, and reporting checklists (COREQ, SRQR).
Myth: A study of 15 interviews is invalid because the sample is small.
The aim is depth, not a prevalence. Sample size is judged by saturation, which empirical tests reached within 9 to 17 interviews.
Myth: Qualitative findings apply to the whole population.
They cannot be generalised statistically. Readers judge whether they transfer to their own setting, using the description of participants and context.
Myth: A focus group is a quick way to interview many people at once.
A focus group uses the discussion between participants as data. Asking each person in turn is a group interview.
Myth: Software does the analysis.
Software stores and retrieves coded text. The researcher decides the codes, categories and themes.
Myth: Triangulation means using exactly three methods.
It means more than one method, data source, investigator or theory. The name comes from surveying, not from the number three.
Why this matters to you
Five consequences of getting qualitative methods wrong
Protocol sent back
The committee asks how you will choose participants and why that number. State purposive criteria and how you will judge saturation.
A results chapter that is a list of quotes
Quotes arranged under interview questions, with no codes or themes, do not show how you reached your conclusions.
Questions you cannot answer at the viva
What is saturation? How is a focus group different from a group interview? How did you establish credibility?
Misreading papers
Judging an interview study by its p-values, or accepting one that does not say who collected the data and how themes were derived.
Programmes that miss the reasons
A service planned from numbers alone may not address the reasons patients give for not using it.
History
History of qualitative research methods
- 1900–01
Edmund Husserl
Logical Investigations launched phenomenology as a philosophy.
- 1922
Bronisław Malinowski
Argonauts of the Western Pacific, based on months of fieldwork among the Trobriand Islanders, set out his methods of fieldwork.
- 1946
Robert Merton and Patricia Kendall
Described "the focused interview", designed to find out how people responded to a situation the investigator had already analysed.
- 1967
Barney Glaser and Anselm Strauss
The Discovery of Grounded Theory introduced theory built from data, the constant comparative method and theoretical saturation.
- 1978
Norman Denzin
The 1978 edition of The Research Act (first published 1970) is cited for four types of triangulation.
- 1985
Yvonna Lincoln and Egon Guba
Naturalistic Inquiry proposed credibility, transferability, dependability and confirmability as equivalents of internal validity, external validity, reliability and objectivity.
- 1995
Catherine Pope and Nicholas Mays, BMJ
Began a BMJ series showing how qualitative methods can complement quantitative research, with "Reaching the parts other methods cannot reach".
- 2006
Virginia Braun and Victoria Clarke
Set out six phases of thematic analysis.
- 2007
Allison Tong, Peter Sainsbury and Jonathan Craig
Published COREQ, a 32-item checklist for reporting interview and focus group studies.
- 2022
Monique Hennink and Bonnie Kaiser
A systematic review of 23 articles found saturation within 9 to 17 interviews or 4 to 8 focus groups in empirical tests.
Guidelines
Qualitative research in guidelines
A 32-item checklist for reporting studies that use in-depth interviews and focus groups, grouped into three domains: research team and reflexivity, study design, and data analysis and reporting.
The Standards for Reporting Qualitative Research: 21 items, written for the broad range of qualitative approaches.
“Informed consent is very often dynamic in nature and negotiable. When written consent may not be possible, other means could be used and documented.” Preliminary observation to prepare notes, before the research based on that observation begins, need not be submitted for ethics committee review.
Steps
Doing an interview or focus group study, step by step
- Write a broad, open research question and choose the design that fits it.
- Define whom you need and why: the setting, the purposive criteria, and an estimated number.
- Prepare the interview guide or questioning route, and pilot it.
- Obtain ethics approval. Plan consent, audio-recording, confidentiality and what to do if a participant becomes distressed.
- Collect data, record it, transcribe word for word, and write field notes.
- Start analysis after the first interview: code, group into categories, build themes, and write memos.
- Continue until new data add no new codes, then confirm with two or three more.
- Check trustworthiness: triangulation, member checking, an audit trail and a reflexive account.
- Report the study using COREQ or SRQR.
Reading a paper
Five checks on any qualitative study
- Does the research question need a qualitative approach?
- Were participants chosen on purpose, with stated criteria, and is saturation explained?
- Do the authors say who collected the data, with what guide, and how it was recorded and transcribed?
- Is it clear how codes and themes were derived, and do the quotes support the themes?
- Did the authors address reflexivity, use triangulation or member checking, and follow COREQ or SRQR?
Why is it called that?
Word surgery
“Saturation”
Soaked through, completely full.
The point in data collection when new interviews or observations add no new codes or themes.
“Theme”
The subject of an essay or the decoration of a party.
A pattern of meaning found across many participants, built from grouped codes.
“Observation”
A doctor watching a patient, or simply noticing something.
Systematic watching of people and events in their natural setting, recorded as field notes.
Credibility pairs with internal validity, transferability with external validity, dependability with reliability, and confirmability with objectivity.
Qualitative
Latin qualitas: "a quality, property, nature"
Research about the qualities of experience and behaviour, recorded mainly as words.
Quantitative
Medieval Latin quantitativus, from Latin quantitas
Research that measures amounts and counts, recorded as numbers.
Ethnography
Greek ethnos: "people, nation, tribe" + -graphia: "description of", from graphein, "to write"
A written description of the culture of a group, based on long fieldwork.
Phenomenology
Greek phainomenon: "that which appears or is seen" + -logia: "discourse, science"
The study of experience as it appears to the person who lives it.
Triangulation
Latin triangulum: triangle. Used by 1891 for measuring a region by a series of triangles
Checking a finding from more than one method, source, investigator or theory.
Focus
Latin focus: "hearth, fireplace". Used by Kepler in 1604 for "point of convergence"
A focus group discussion keeps a group on one topic.
Exam answers
Model answer outlines
Qualitative vs quantitative research: differences, when to prefer each, classification of quantitative designs, and why design matters
Ph.D. RM 2024, 2025 · MD Community Medicine 2022| Feature | Quantitative | Qualitative |
|---|---|---|
| Question | How many, how much, how often | What, how, why |
| Aim | Measure, test hypotheses | Understand meaning and process, generate hypotheses |
| Sample | Large, random, power calculation | Small, purposive, saturation |
| Data and tools | Numbers, structured questionnaires | Words, interviews, focus groups, observation |
| Design | Fixed in advance | Emerging, flexible |
| Analysis | Statistical | Coding and themes |
| Quality | Validity, reliability | Credibility, transferability, dependability, confirmability |
| Output | Generalisable estimates | Themes, description, theory |
Prefer qualitative when little is known, when reasons and experiences are needed, to develop a questionnaire, or to explain survey results. Prefer quantitative to estimate frequency, test a hypothesis or compare treatments. Combine them in mixed methods.
Classification of quantitative designs:
- Descriptive observational: case report, case series, cross-sectional survey, ecological study.
- Analytical observational: case-control study, cohort study.
- Experimental: randomised controlled trial, field trial, community trial. Non-randomised (quasi-experimental) studies.
Why design matters: it matches the method to the question, controls bias and confounding, fixes the sample, data and analysis in advance, and decides how strong the evidence is and which conclusions are allowed.
Qualitative research methods and their role in public health
MD Community Medicine 2014, 2015, 2025Definition: research that studies experiences, meanings, behaviour and processes in their natural setting, using words and observations rather than numbers.
Methods: in-depth interviews, key informant interviews, focus group discussions, participant observation, document review, participatory mapping. Designs: ethnography, phenomenology, grounded theory, case study.
Role in public health:
- Exploring public understanding of illness and health behaviour, and why some sections of the population use health services less (Kitzinger, 1995).
- Assessing health education messages.
- Designing and testing the wording of questionnaires, and explaining survey results.
- Evaluating programmes and treatment.
- Implementation research, often with mixed methods (ICMR, 2017).
- Studying health systems and stakeholders, for example with case studies and social network analysis.
- Generating hypotheses for later quantitative studies.
Epidemiological study designs (for the 2014 question): descriptive (case report, case series, cross-sectional, ecological), analytical (case-control, cohort) and experimental (randomised controlled trial, field trial, community trial).
Limits: not statistically generalisable, time-consuming, dependent on researcher skill.
Types of qualitative research design, tools, and software for analysing qualitative data
MD Community Medicine 2023 · Ph.D. RM 2014| Design | Studies | Main data | Sampling | Output |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ethnography | Culture of a group | Participant observation, informal conversations, interviews | Key informants | Detailed description of a culture |
| Phenomenology | Lived experience | In-depth interviews | People who had the experience | Themes describing its essential meaning |
| Grounded theory | A social process | Interviews, observation | Purposive, then theoretical | A theory |
| Case study | One bounded case in context | Several sources combined | Intrinsic, instrumental or collective | In-depth account of the case |
| Descriptive qualitative | Views, barriers, facilitators | Interviews, focus groups | Purposive, convenience, snowball | Summary of themes |
Other designs: narrative research, conversation analysis, historical research, participatory action research.
Tools: interview guide, focus group questioning route, observation field notes, audio recorder and verbatim transcripts, document review, participatory network mapping (Net-Map).
Software: NVivo, ATLAS.ti, MAXQDA. QDA Miner Lite (free). Taguette (free and open source). Software supports storing and coding. The researcher does the interpretation.
Ethnography: ethnographic research design
Ph.D. RM 2015, 2016, 2025- Definition: the study of the culture of a group (shared behaviour, beliefs, practices) through long periods of fieldwork in its natural setting. From Greek ethnos (people) and graphein (to write).
- Origin: Malinowski's fieldwork among the Trobriand Islanders, Argonauts of the Western Pacific (1922).
- Features: natural setting, prolonged engagement, the researcher as the main instrument, emerging design, context-rich description.
- Steps: choose the setting and gain access through gatekeepers, select key informants purposively, observe and write field notes (descriptive, then focused, then selective), hold informal conversations and interviews, collect documents, analyse patterns from the first day, write a detailed description of the culture.
- Observer roles (Gold, 1958): complete participant, participant-as-observer, observer-as-participant, complete observer.
- Health example: the culture of handover between theatre and ICU staff.
- Strengths: shows behaviour and interactions in their natural setting.
- Limits: time-consuming, people may behave differently when observed, researcher influence, consent in open settings (ICMR 2017 accepts that consent may be dynamic, and in some observational research an ethics committee may waive it).
Phenomenology
Ph.D. RM 2015- Definition: the study of lived experience, as experienced from the first-person point of view. From Greek phainomenon, “that which appears”.
- Origin: Edmund Husserl, Logical Investigations (1900–01). His later method of epoché, or “bracketing”, sets aside the question of whether the outside world exists in order to study experience itself.
- Research question: “What is it like to...?”, for example the lived experience of caring for a relative on dialysis.
- Sampling: criterion sampling of people who have had the experience but differ in other characteristics. Samples are small.
- Data: in-depth interviews, audio-recorded and transcribed word for word.
- Analysis: identify themes within and across interviews. The output is a detailed description of the essential meaning of the experience.
- Rigour: reflexivity about the researcher's own assumptions, member checking, thick description.
- Limits: findings describe the participants' experience and are not statistically generalisable. Needs participants who can put their experience into words and reflect on it.
Focus group discussion (FGD): conduct, strengths and weaknesses, and qualities of the facilitator
Ph.D. RM 2016, 2018, 2021, 2023 · MD Community Medicine 2024Definition: a small group guided by a moderator to discuss a topic, where the interaction between members is used as data.
Conduct: 6 to 12 participants who share a key characteristic, a moderator and a note-taker, a questioning route of open questions, ground rules and consent, audio-recording, 45 to 120 minutes, repeated groups until saturation (usually 4 to 8 groups).
| Strengths | Weaknesses |
|---|---|
| Participants build on each other's comments, which produces a wide range of ideas | Dominant participants or the moderator can sway opinions |
| Shows how views form within a group and culture | Discussion can move away from the topic and time is lost |
| Includes people who cannot read or write | Not representative of a population |
| People reluctant to be interviewed alone may take part | Hard to discuss sensitive personal experiences in front of others |
| Generates hypotheses and questionnaire items | Participants may behave differently when observed |
Qualities of the facilitator (moderator):
- Explains the purpose, ground rules, recording and confidentiality clearly.
- Neutral and non-judgemental, and tells participants there are no right or wrong answers.
- Skilled at probing: “Can you tell me more?”, “Would you give me an example?”.
- Manages group dynamics: draws in quiet members and limits dominant ones.
- Keeps the discussion on the topic and on time, and knows the questioning route well.
- Works with a note-taker who records who spoke, in what order and in what tone.
Scenario: in an FGD with mothers on missed measles vaccination, one mother insists the vaccine causes fever and the others fall silent. The facilitator thanks her, asks whether anyone had a different experience, and invites a mother who has not spoken.
In-depth interviews
Ph.D. RM 2023- Definition: an individual, face-to-face interview that explores one person's experiences and perspectives on a set of issues (DiCicco-Bloom and Crabtree, 2006).
- Types: structured, semi-structured (most common in qualitative research), unstructured. Key informant interviews target people with special knowledge.
- Preparation: interview guide with open questions, probes and prompts, piloted. Purposive sample. Consent, private place, audio-recording.
- Conduct: 30 to 90 minutes. Start with broad open questions, then follow up. Do not steer answers towards your own view, and let the participant speak freely.
- After the interview: verbatim transcription, field notes, analysis before the next interview, continue to saturation.
- Advantages: depth and detail, suits personal issues, individual experience without group pressure.
- Limits: time-consuming, interviewer influence, socially desirable answers, small numbers.
- Reporting: COREQ checklist.
Concept of triangulation in research
Ph.D. RM 2024- Definition: the use of multiple methods or data sources to develop a comprehensive understanding of a phenomenon, and to test validity through the convergence of information from different sources (Carter et al., 2014).
- Origin of the term: surveying, where a point is located from a series of triangles.
- Types (Denzin, 1978): data source, investigator, theory and method triangulation.
- Example: reasons for stopping TB treatment studied through patient interviews, focus groups with health workers and treatment records.
- Purpose: credibility of qualitative findings (Lincoln and Guba, 1985), a fuller picture, and in mixed methods, combining numbers with reasons.
- Limits: needs more time and resources.
Social network analysis as a qualitative research tool for public health interventions
MD Community Medicine 2023- Definition: the study of social structure: who is connected to whom, and how those connections shape behaviour and the flow of information.
- Terms: node (person or organisation), tie (relationship), sociogram (network map), degree centrality (number of ties), betweenness centrality (lying on paths between others), density (proportion of possible ties present).
- Stages in health systems research: describe the actors, characterise their relationships, analyse the structure (Blanchet and James, 2011).
- Qualitative approach: interviews or participatory mapping (for example Net-Map), where participants draw the network and explain the ties in their own words.
- Uses in public health: disease transmission, spread of information and innovations, social support, the effect of networks on health behaviour, and the structure of health systems (Luke and Harris, 2007). Network data can be used to design interventions that speed behaviour change (Valente, 2012).
- Example: choosing an intervention champion. The most named person is not always best, and betweenness can identify people who reach marginal groups (Hawe and Ghali, 2007).
- Limits: names of third parties are recorded, so confidentiality needs care. Data collection is time-consuming.
Advantages of qualitative study
Ph.D. RM 2019- Explains why and how, the reasons behind numbers.
- Useful where little is known, and generates hypotheses.
- Studies people in their natural setting, and is open to unexpected findings.
- Flexible, emerging design.
- Gives participants a voice in their own words, including people who cannot read or write.
- Helps design and test questionnaires, and explains survey results.
- Small samples make it feasible in one setting.
- Helps evaluate programmes and treatment.
Balance with limits: not statistically generalisable, researcher influence, time-consuming analysis.
The one thing to remember
Choose participants for the information they can give, and keep collecting data until new interviews add nothing new.
Teaching examples (the TB survey, quotes, saturation chart and network) use made-up data. Totals in the saturation example were checked in Python.
Sources: Pope C, Mays N. BMJ 1995;311:42–5 (doi:10.1136/bmj.311.6996.42). Mays N, Pope C. Rigour and qualitative research. BMJ 1995;311:109–12 (doi:10.1136/bmj.311.6997.109). Mays N, Pope C. Observational methods in health care settings. BMJ 1995;311:182–4 (doi:10.1136/bmj.311.6998.182). Kitzinger J. Introducing focus groups. BMJ 1995;311:299–302 (doi:10.1136/bmj.311.7000.299). Wong LP. Singapore Med J 2008;49:256–60 (PMID 18363011). Korstjens I, Moser A. Eur J Gen Pract 2017;23:274–9 (doi:10.1080/13814788.2017.1375090). Moser A, Korstjens I. Eur J Gen Pract 2017;24:9–18 (doi:10.1080/13814788.2017.1375091). Korstjens I, Moser A. Eur J Gen Pract 2017;24:120–4 (doi:10.1080/13814788.2017.1375092). DiCicco-Bloom B, Crabtree BF. Med Educ 2006;40:314–21 (doi:10.1111/j.1365-2929.2006.02418.x). Crowe S et al. BMC Med Res Methodol 2011;11:100 (doi:10.1186/1471-2288-11-100). Malinowski B. Argonauts of the Western Pacific. London: Routledge; 1922. Husserl E. Logical Investigations, 1900–01, as described in the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy entry “Phenomenology”. Glaser BG, Strauss AL. The Discovery of Grounded Theory. Chicago: Aldine; 1967. Merton RK, Kendall PL. Am J Sociol 1946;51:541–57 (doi:10.1086/219886). Gold RL. Soc Forces 1958;36:217–23 (doi:10.2307/2573808). Denzin NK. The Research Act. Chicago: Aldine; 1970. Carter N et al. Oncol Nurs Forum 2014;41:545–7 (doi:10.1188/14.ONF.545-547). Lincoln YS, Guba EG. Naturalistic Inquiry. 1985. Braun V, Clarke V. Qual Res Psychol 2006;3:77–101 (doi:10.1191/1478088706qp063oa). Guest G, Bunce A, Johnson L. Field Methods 2006;18:59–82 (doi:10.1177/1525822X05279903). Hennink MM, Kaiser BN, Marconi VC. Qual Health Res 27:591–608 (doi:10.1177/1049732316665344). Hennink M, Kaiser BN. Soc Sci Med 2022;292:114523 (doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2021.114523). Tong A, Sainsbury P, Craig J. Int J Qual Health Care 2007;19:349–57 (doi:10.1093/intqhc/mzm042). O'Brien BC et al. Acad Med 2014;89:1245–51 (doi:10.1097/ACM.0000000000000388). Hawe P, Ghali L. Health Educ Res 23:62–9 (doi:10.1093/her/cyl162). Blanchet K, James P. Health Policy Plan 27:438–46 (doi:10.1093/heapol/czr055). Luke DA, Harris JK. Annu Rev Public Health 2007;28:69–93 (doi:10.1146/annurev.publhealth.28.021406.144132). Valente TW. Science 2012;337:49–53 (doi:10.1126/science.1217330). Mabena SY, Armstrong SJ. Health SA 2025;30:3147 (doi:10.4102/hsag.v30i0.3147). Indian Council of Medical Research. National Ethical Guidelines for Biomedical and Health Research Involving Human Participants, 2017, section 9.
Past papers
Every TNMGRMU question on qualitative research
Each one is answered in this chapter. Tap a sitting to open the university's own question paper.
- ×2Focus groups
- ×1What are the Qualitative Research methods? Enumerate the role in Public health
- ×1Discuss the role of qualitative research methods in public health
- ×1Classify Quantitative Research Designs. Discuss the Differences between qualitative and qualitative research approaches. Why is design important in Research studies?
- ×1Ethnographic research
- ×1Outline the strength and weakness of Focus Group Discussion (FGD). Discuss the qualities of facilitator of FDG with suitable scenario
- ×1Discuss the differences between qualitative and quantitative research approaches. When and why might one be preferred over the other?
- ×1Concept of triangulation in Research
- ×1Describe “Social Network Analysis” as a Qualitative Research Tool for Public Health interventions
- ×1Describe the study designs for Qualitative research? What are the tools that can be used for qualitative studies? List the various software available for Analysing Qualitative Data
- ×1In depth interviews
- ×1FGD (Focus Group Discussion)
- ×1Quantitative vs Qualitative research
- ×1Focus Group discussions
- ×1Advantages of qualitative study
- ×1Ethnography
- ×1Qualitative Research
- ×1Ethnography design
- ×1Phenomenology
- ×1List the various types of epidemiological study designs. Write role of qualitative research
- ×1Discuss the types of qualitative research design